Modern ML systems sometimes undergo qualitative shifts in behavior simply by “scaling up” the number of parameters and training examples. Given this, how can we extrapolate the behavior of future ML systems and ensure that they behave safely and are aligned with humans? I’ll argue that we can often study (potential) capabilities of future ML systems through well-controlled experiments run on current systems, and use this as a laboratory for designing alignment techniques. I’ll also discuss some recent work on “medium-term” AI forecasting.
Build the Finance Skills That Lead to Promotions — Not Just Certificates
Live Online Classes in Design, Coding & AI — Small Classes, Free Retakes
Overview
Google, IBM & Meta Certificates — All 10,000+ Courses at 40% Off
One annual plan covers every course and certificate on Coursera. 40% off for a limited time.
Get Full Access
Syllabus
Introduction.
Rest of Talk.
Reward Hacking: Motivation.
Reward Hacking Example.
Reward Hacking: Example.
Summary of Full Results.
Reward Hacking: Summary.
Making NLP Models Truthful.
Contrastive Representation Clustering.
Results on Unified QA.
Caveat: True Answers Work Too.
Forecasting: Motivation.
Forecasting Competition.
Forecasting Questions.
Summary of Benchmark Forecasts.
Results So Far.
Forecasting: Lessons Learned.
Forecasting Class.
Taught by
Stanford Online