AI Is Human, Not Artificial - Reframing Intelligence Through Social Modeling and Symbiosis
Stanford University via YouTube
-
66
-
- Write review
Power BI Fundamentals - Create visualizations and dashboards from scratch
NY State-Licensed Certificates in Design, Coding & AI — Online
Overview
Google, IBM & Meta Certificates — All 10,000+ Courses at 40% Off
One annual plan covers every course and certificate on Coursera. 40% off for a limited time.
Get Full Access
Explore a thought-provoking seminar where Google's CTO of Technology and Society, Blaise Agüera y Arcas, challenges conventional perspectives on artificial intelligence by reframing it through the lens of social modeling, intersubjectivity, and symbiosis. Discover how the discourse around AI often portrays it as alien and inscrutable, while Agüera presents compelling arguments for viewing AI as fundamentally human rather than artificial. Examine new perspectives on life and evolution, the intricate relationship between humans and technology, and profound questions about free will and consciousness. Learn how the breakthrough in creating "real" AI with general capabilities in the 2020s emerged not only from computational neuroscience but also from large-scale modeling of human language, which Agüera describes as the "DNA" of our collective intelligence. Gain insights into the deep and largely positive implications of this reframing of intelligence, and engage with the philosophical and practical considerations of AI development through both the main presentation and an extensive Q&A session that follows the lecture.
Syllabus
00:00:00 Introduction
00:00:32 Lecture
00:53:50 Q&A
Taught by
Stanford HAI
Tags
Reviews
4.0 rating, based on 1 Class Central review
Showing Class Central Sort
-
This course is more like a single lecture topic than a full-fledged online course... that being said, the content is a substantive talk in support of a controversial premise that life is computational, therefore AI and eventually AGI that self-replicates and exhibits internal unity could be considered living. The talk serves more as a "further reading" list of background sources used, so deeper engagement with the material is necessary to have a comprehensive understanding of it. At the very least, it's interesting and pertinent to current discussions around AI.