Class Central is learner-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

YouTube

Scientists' Role in Public Policy: Expert Judgment and Environmental Change

AGU via YouTube

Overview

Coursera Flash Sale
40% Off Coursera Plus for 3 Months!
Grab it
Explore the complex relationship between scientific expertise and public policy in this AGU Fall Meeting lecture. Delve into the challenges scientists face when engaging in public debates, examining the roles of generalists and experts. Analyze Snow's theory and the limitations of scientific knowledge in policy-making. Investigate various approaches for scientists to participate in public discourse, including taking sides, making political endorsements, and maintaining objectivity. Learn about the importance of expert judgment, the role of the IPCC, and strategies for effectively communicating scientific findings. Gain insights on maintaining perspective, leveraging diverse expertise, and managing time efficiently when involved in policy discussions. Understand the potential consequences of public engagement and receive valuable advice for scientists navigating the complex landscape of science and policy.

Syllabus

Introduction
Roadmap
Generalist vs Expert
Snows Theory
Limitations of Science
Involvement in the Public Debate
Questions
Climategate
Individual Responsibility
Option 1 Publicly Take Sides
Option 2 Political Endorsements
Option 3 Political Endorsements
My Ground Rule
Take Both Sides
Scientists Do It All The Time
Ground Rule
Expert Judgement
I did my homework
Intermediate steps
IPCC
The Fifth Option
Maintaining Perspective
Other Expertise
Use Your Time Efficiently
Expect to Be vilified
Steves Advice

Taught by

AGU

Reviews

Start your review of Scientists' Role in Public Policy: Expert Judgment and Environmental Change

Never Stop Learning.

Get personalized course recommendations, track subjects and courses with reminders, and more.

Someone learning on their laptop while sitting on the floor.