Expert evidence and forensic science in the courtroom
The Open University via OpenLearn
-
20
-
- Write review
Live Online Classes in Design, Coding & AI — Small Classes, Free Retakes
Learn Generative AI, Prompt Engineering, and LLMs for Free
Overview
Google, IBM & Meta Certificates – 40% Off
One Coursera Plus subscription covers most Professional Certificates on Coursera.
Unlock All Certificates
This free course gives an overview of the law of expert evidence, including practice and procedure, the duties and liabilities of experts, the question of how non-experts can adjudicate between the views of experts, and the increasing mathematisation of scientific evidence. The various issues are finally brought together in a case study of one of the most notorious miscarriages of justice in recent years.This OpenLearn course is an adapted extract from the Open University course W250 Evidence law and related to the Open University qualification Bachelor of Laws (Honours) (LLB).
Syllabus
- Introduction
- Learning outcomes
- 1 Rationale for expert evidence
- 2 Admissibility of expert evidence
- 2.1 Relevance
- 2.2 Assistance
- 2.3 Reliability
- 2.4 Expertise
- 2.5 Hearsay
- 3 Duties and responsibilities of an expert
- 3.1 Hired guns and bias
- 3.2 The Civil Procedure Rules
- 3.3 Liability and immunity of experts
- 3.3.1 Criminal liability
- 3.3.2 Civil liability and immunity
- 3.3.3 Disciplinary proceedings
- 4 How non-experts can scrutinise experts
- 4.1 Other means of scrutinising experts
- 5 Numbers
- 5.1 The prosecutor’s fallacy
- 5.2 Partial solutions
- 6 When science meets law
- 6.1 An introduction to Bayesianism
- 6.2 Bayes’ Rule in practice: the likelihood ratio
- 6.3 The problem with Bayes’ Rule
- 6.3.1 Bayesian fundamentalism
- 6.3.2 Bayesian skepticism
- 7 Expert evidence case study
- 7.1 The Sally Clark case
- 7.2 The statistical evidence
- 7.3 The medical evidence
- 7.4 The aftermath
- Conclusion
- Exploring further
- References
- Acknowledgements