Class Central is learner-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Mathematics and Democracy Teach Out

Johns Hopkins University via Coursera

Go to class Write review

Details

Go to class

Provider

Coursera
Pricing

Paid Course
Languages

English
Effort

12 hours 30 minutes
Sessions

Self-Paced
Level

Beginner
Subtitles

English

Found in

Overview

Google, IBM & Meta Certificates – 40% Off

One plan covers every Professional Certificate on Coursera.

Unlock All Certificates

This course is aimed at anyone who has interest in the lens through which mathematicians view democracy. You will learn theories and approaches to the mathematics of voting.

Syllabus

Module 1

This module sets the stage for the entire Teach Out. We begin by discussing the nature of mathematics (as opposed to arithmetic) and develop a workable abstract model for democracy: a function that takes individual preferences and returns a group decision. We then look closely at different methods for two-party elections, fairness criteria we want these functions to have, and conclude that only the Simple Majority method satisfies those criteria.

Module 2

This module builds on the work from Module 1 by considering elections with three (or more) candidates. We examine various decision functions (such as Plurality and Borda Counts) as well as properties we want those functions to have. We conclude with Arrow’s Theorem that shows that there are no decision functions satisfying basic fairness criteria.

Module 3

In the previous modules we assumed that each voter ranks the candidates from most to least desirable; these individual rankings are the inputs to the decision functions. In this module we question the viability of asking voters to rank both for psychological reasons (it is very difficult to rank a long list of options) and—more to the point of this Teach Out—for mathematical reasons. We model preference using a simple game played with dice that illustrates non-transitive preference: A is better than B, B is better than C, but C is better than A!

Module 4

This module considers mathematical issues arising in representative democracy in which elected officials make decisions for the larger population. In the United States House of Representatives, the number of representatives from a given state is proportional to the population of that state. However, since the number of representatives from a state must be a whole number, and the total number of representatives is 435, we need a method by which seats are allocated to states. We present the apportionment methods of Hamilton and Jefferson, and discuss problems arising with these methods. We conclude with a theorem of Balinsky and Young that shows there are no apportionment methods satisfying basic fairness conditions.