Jerusalem: What Sharing a City Means

A confronting fantasy to imagine in the current climate. This has travelled time so well and so poorly. I understand and respect the grasp of hope and sharing; in an ideal world perhaps this could've been the case. The references to various topics or people that are more relevant now than ever were humbling in light on the political changes. Brilliant few questions posed by audience that really touched on the depths I would've appreciated included further in the overall presentation. I think too much has happened now to ever realistically strive for sharing, when the core aspect of the framework relies on mutually respecting every human's humanity - which is clearly disregard by certain parties even right up to the UN and ICJ rulings, let alone international perspectives. On reflection, the key takeaway that has not changed and will never, is sumud. Standing resilient, steadfast and hopeful in your indigeneity is the most indigenous thing you can do. Kia kaha, kia māia, kia manawanui.

Taking this course was one of the most eye-opening learning experiences I’ve had. I came in with a basic understanding of Jerusalem as a contested religious city, but I’m leaving with a much deeper appreciation of its layered identities, histories, and the real-life complexities of people who live there.

What stood out most was how the course didn't try to simplify or take sides—it respected the complexity of the subject. We learned not just about religion or politics in isolation, but how they’re woven into the everyday fabric of the city. From analyzing maps to hearing narratives from various communities—Jewish, Palestinian, Christian, Armenian—it felt like I was walking through the city’s streets with a more informed, empathetic lens.

The course structure was also excellent. The videos were well-produced, the reading materials were thought-provoking, and the discussion prompts helped me reflect deeply. The idea of “sharing” a city was explored in ways I hadn’t imagined before—not just theoretically, but spatially and emotionally.

If I could suggest one thing, it would be to include even more firsthand voices from current residents—maybe interviews or on-the-ground storytelling. But overall, the balance between historical context and present-day dynamics was really well handled.

This course challenged my assumptions, made me ask difficult questions, and most importantly, it made me care. I’d recommend it to anyone interested in Middle Eastern politics, urban conflict, or simply what it means to live together in a divided world.