Nutrition, Heart Disease and Diabetes

From the title of the course, it appears that this course should be focusing on nutritional therapy for cardiometabolic diseases. However, the course didn't really focus on that and largely focused on the pathophysiology, genetics and epigenetics. Indeed, these areas are very important in the management of cardiometabolic diseases, however, the title of this course should be Nutrigenomics of Cardiometabolic diseases rather than Nutrition, Heart and Diabetes.

Nutritional therapy was discussed as an overview in the course. One video combined many eating patterns and discussed them in quick sentences. For instance, low carb diet (ketogenic diet) has been mentioned as nutritional therapy for T2DM in the ADA T2DM Nutrition guidelines, why it was not discussed sufficiently in this course? Another example, there are many research evidences on the role of intermittent fasting and low-calorie diet as nutritional therapy for obesity, why this was not discussed? Studies on plant-based diet was not really discussed enough. A course with the title of Nutrition, Heart and Diabetes should have discussed all of these dietary approaches in details.

If you are interested in the research area of Nutrigenomics, I advise you to take this course.

The Pros:
This course does not take the typical mainstream approach to nutrition and effects. It is quite updated and quotes a few great researchers.

The epigenetic part of the fourth module and gut microbiome are also great since they are up to date.

Th cons:
Even though some old dogmas are challenged a bit, there is still a lot of resistance to knew findings for EBM. Ketogenic diets are mentioned (a little) and their effect on weight loss, it seems there is still hesitation when going against old obsolete dogmas such as low salt intake and the 7 country study (which really has 22 countries and is skewed). The LDL generalization (as bad) in segments but categorization (some are bad but not all) in others is not consitent. Same goes for saturated fats and the generalization. The nona non-linear relationship between mortality and blood pressure is also of vast importance but I only see the contrary here.

Overall it is very much worth the time, above average knowledge and interactive as well.

I like it. It's very scientific based on the fact and research presented in an attractive way. Topics are diverse but relevant to the course objective. I encouraged others to take this course. I gained much knowledge and deep understanding of the nutrition in disease prevention. I enjoyed the videos and the reading explanation. We can see that organizers and lectures had exerted much effort. Appreciated the detail explanation and the science behind the facts.

Just one suggestion I would like to make is to reduce the research portions about the Gene study. It's rather complicated at the molecular level which is good for knowledge but tiresome to take exercise tests on this topic. Ungraded tests are fine because you can attempt several times and give you insights. Graded test could pay more focus on the practical tips and advice that people can follow and benefits.

Ultimately we aim to serve the public and patients with nutrition guidelines, tailored plans and recommendation that would benefit them.

All the best and thanks for the excellent work.

I seldom give a 5-star rating to any course because I always believe that the course could have put an extra effort into the content, structure, layout, course assessments, and the learner support platform. The course on Nutrition, Heart Disease, and Diabetes checks all these boxes for me.

The strongest attribute of this course is undoubtedly its content. At first, the amount of information provided may seem overwhelming but the course gradually breaks down each topic from its tiny bits until all the details come together for a more comprehensive and meaningful picture. It explains that diseases like heart disease, diabetes, stroke, and chronic kidney disease are part of a single cluster of diseases termed 'Cardiometabolic disease' and that each of these component diseases has an inter-related pathophysiological pathway. The discussion on each macronutrient and the evidence-based dietary guidelines provided through this course have certainly enhanced my knowledge. It also gives an overview of the genetics involved in chronic, complex diseases and how genetic research has contributed to our understanding of the biological processes that potentiate the onset of disease if a conducive environment is also present.

Some topics might be too technical for laypersons, but anyone with some high school knowledge on nutrition and non-communicable diseases may find this course enjoyable and very informative. It may also serve as a good 'primer' knowledge for medical doctors who have not been trained enough in the field of nutrition and disease. Besides the use of some technical terms, the less meaningful information given on several dietary trials, and the lack of a practical dietary guideline that can be applied immediately in clinical practice, the course still manages to deliver valuable and convincing content that empowers anyone to take their health more seriously.

Some parts of this topic like effect of beverages,salts and dietery approaches,introduction to diabetes,measuring insulin resistance,role of adipose tissues in our cardiometabolic health and various interviews were explained pretty well. I also got to know a lot about mediterranean diet and above all i was surprised to know that fish has adverse as well as harmful effects too because till now i only believed that it is good for our health.
What i disliked about this course was some of the genetical part like genomic wide association studies(gwas) and epigenomic wide association studies(ewas) somehow lacked some information or i felt that it was not required in this course.
Concluding this all i would like to say i liked this course and it helped me lot in coming across new things which is much much needed in our daily lives.