Making your Case to Prosecute Fraud for Investigators Course

Module 1: Understanding the Fraud Case

• Break down and apply the five elements of a prosecutable fraud scheme (lie, authority, reliance, value, intent).
• Examine how prosecutors evaluate loss, witness strength, and jury appeal when deciding to charge.
• Work through case exercises to distinguish mistakes from intentional deception.
• Identify evidentiary indicators that support each fraud element.

Module 2: Investigation/Audit Joint Efforts

• Trace the evolution of audit–investigation partnerships and data-matching projects that detect fraud.
• Define the Fraud Task Force, its goals, and the primary/secondary roles of investigators, auditors, and prosecutors.
• Review charging pathways (indictment, complaint, information, civil complaint) and when each is used.
• Practice team communication, role interchangeability, and planning for complex, multi-agency cases.

Module 3: Investigation in the Legal Environment

• Differentiate types of evidence (documentary, testimonial, forensic, analytical) and their courtroom use.
• Compare lawful methods to obtain records (search warrants; grand jury, HIPAA, civil, trial, and administrative subpoenas).
• Apply key rules (best evidence, business records, hearsay exceptions, relevancy, grand jury secrecy) to investigative work.
• Anticipate procedural issues when routine program inquiries become potential criminal matters.

Module 4: Applying the Fraud Elements to the Investigation Plan

• Align the investigation plan with the prosecutor’s theory and the elements to be proved.
• Understand charging documents (arrest warrant, information, indictment, civil complaint) and what they must show.
• Organize records and build spreadsheets/workpapers that clearly tie evidence to the alleged scheme.
• Map program operations and record systems to support admissibility, authenticity, and traceability at trial.

Module 5: A Guide to Investigation Planning, Implementation, and Court

• Sequence investigative tasks from scoping and evidence control through analysis and referral.
• Prepare exhibits and documentation that withstand evidentiary challenges in court.
• Coordinate with counsel on trial preparation, witness readiness, and presentation of complex record systems.
• Translate investigative findings into charging language, remedies, and clear courtroom narratives.